How does work the technology (torture) that is slowly killing millions of innocent citizens around the world? yes, I’m talking about TARGETED INDIVIDUALS.

There are constant breaks between torture sessions so that the victim doesn’t begin to ‘Habitualize’ to the pain, meaning so the pain level and pain threshold of the targeted individual does not also increase so that the pain becomes more bearable. So, to prevent an increase in the pain threshold of the target they give the target periodic breaks between torture sessions. They are not using a mouse or a screen. They are using two interfaces against you and all TI’S: a brain to computer interface and an electronic brain to brain interface. You have been ‘CLONED’ to a supercomputer and to the DIA operator/behavioral scientist who is monitoring you, known as handlers. There are usually four to six of these because they work in shifts. Once the handler places the electronic helmet on his head and achieves Integration Completion with the targets brain, then there is at that moment an remote tie between the brain of the handler and your brain. They can see through your eyes. They can hear through your ears. They can feel what you feel, both physically and psychologically, etc. They can literally read your mind and hear your thoughts at speed of light (energy travels at speed of light) in ‘Real Time’ as you are thinking them. Then they will constantly inject, using a continuous remotely applied stream of directed electromagnetic energy, which is specifically tuned to your unique brain wave frequency known as your ‘Specific Residence Frequency’ various thoughts, emotions, memories, aromas, images, etc. because it is a fabricated and falsified stream of electromagnetic energy designed to mimic the normal electromagnetic emissions of your brain. The torture is absolutely necessary in order to map out you brain by remotely measuring your responses over a long period of time and then integrating those response statistics into RNM data they can use on you in the future for the purpose of Remote Neural Manipulation of your mind. There is no mouse or computer screen. It is an electronic brain to brain interface using similar technology like that which is used by pilots of the new stealth F-35 fighter which is controlled by the pilots thoughts, not manually. They can manually override if necessary and inject whenever they wish. No, just like the F-35, the trigger is their thoughts and the targeting camera is their eyes. If they think ‘burn his left arm’ then your let arm will burn, etc. Trauma Based Mind Control cannot exist without extreme trauma and pain.

Meet the Online Tracking Device That is Virtually Impossible to Block - by F. Kaskais

(David Sleight/ProPublica)

Update: After this article was published, YouPorn contacted us to say it had removed AddThis technology from its website, saying that the website was “completely unaware that AddThis contained a tracking software that had the potential to jeopardize the privacy of our users.” A spokeswoman for the German digital marketer Ligatus also said that is no longer running its test of canvas fingerprinting, and that it has no plans to use it in the future.

This story was co-published with Mashable.

by Julia Angwin

A new kind of tracking tool, canvas fingerprinting, is being used to follow visitors to thousands of top websites, from to YouPorn.

First documented in a forthcoming paper by researchers at Princeton University and KU Leuven University in Belgium, this type of tracking, called canvas fingerprinting, works by instructing the visitor’s Web browser to draw a hidden image. Because each computer draws the…

View original post 349 more words

Ethics and morality at the end of history

Systemic Disorder

Strange, isn’t it, that the system supposedly representing the apex of human development — even the end of history — has no place for ethics or morality.

Perhaps this becomes inevitable when an ideology develops to the point where the economy is considered to be outside the environment. From that dubious — to put it overly modestly — vantage point, the journey to seeing the environment, and the natural resources and life it contains, as nothing more than a cow to be milked at will is not a long one. A forest counts as nothing unless it can be monetized, which often means knocking it down. Clean air? Clean water? Luxury items for those who can afford them, and thereby profits for those who can bottle it and create a market for them.

Photo by Alex Proimos Photo by Alex Proimos

A thoughtful article in the May 2009 issue of Monthly Review caused me to…

View original post 767 more words

Legal Code on Surveillance by State plus /NSA/War/Public Law
The National Center for Victims of Crime – Video Voyerurism Law for each State.

CHAPTER 119—WIRE AND ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS INTERCEPTION AND INTERCEPTION OF ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (In case you didn’t look it up) Executive Order – 12333  The President Executive Order 13526  Executive Order 13526   18 U.S.C. § 798 : US Code – Section 798: Disclosure of classified information   50 U.S.C. § 403 : US Code- Section 403: Director of National  Intelligence  US Code Title 50  (looking for Section 6)   Department of Defense DIRECTIVE (looking for public law 86-36 (50 U.S code 402  noted)  Notes on 50 U.S.C. § 402 : US Code – Notes NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY ACT OF 1959,  P L 86-36  NSA/CSS Policy 1-23, Procedures Governing NSA/CSS Activities that Affect U.S. Persons

Laws Against Criminal Uses of Electromagnetic Energy Weapons


(1) The European Union Parliament (1999)

The European Parliament A4-0005/1999 Paragraph 27 calls for a worldwide ban on weapons that might enable “any form” of the “manipulation of human beings”.…


2) H.R. 1160 (2001)

Introduced March 22, 2001: terminate operation of the Extremely Low Frequency band


(3) H.R. 2977 (2001) Introduced by Rep. Dennis Kucinich: peaceful uses of space; prohibiting (the unlawful use) of electromagnetic weapons


(4) The Human Rights org (2002)

Media Guide to Disarmament: electromagmentic resonance weapons
The United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) formally listed a special category of psychotronic [psycho-“mind” & tronic=”electronic”] mind control and other electromagmentic resonance weapons in their 2002 Media Guide to Disarmament.


(5) Berkeley, California (2002) Ban the weaponization of space and mind control…
(6) Michigan: House Bill 4513 (2003) Classify harmful electronic or electromagnetic devices
(7) Michigan: House Bill 4514 (2003) Add to statutes to define crimes


(8) Massachusetts: Chapter 170 of the Acts of (2004) Possession of electronic weapons


(9) Maine: Chapter 264 H.P. 868 – L.D. 1271 (2005) Criminal uses of electronic weapons


 (10) Missouri House bill 550 introduced by Jim Guest to against illegal chip implants.


 (11) Electronic Surveillance Laws in USA…


(12)  Michigan House Bill 1026
For the re-opening of investigative hearings into the Counter- Intelligence Program (COINTELPRO) and other intelligence and law enforcement programs and agencies, and an expansion of those hearings to include renewal of previously curtailed abuses, and other activities sanctioned by the USA PATRIOT ACT.


(13)  H.R.5662 IH– STALKERS Act of 2010 (Introduced in House – IH)


(14)  US Code: Chapter 32: 1520 and 1520a – Restrictions on use of human subjects for testing of chemical or biological agents


(15)  Criminal Justice, New Technologies, and the Constitution , May 1988


(16)  2010 California Code: Health and Safety Code: Chapter 1.3. Human Experimentation…


(17) European Convention on Human Rights

The European Convention is still the only international human rights agreement providing such a high degree of individual protection. State parties can also take cases against other state parties to the Court, although this power is rarely used. There are comparable protections issued in the Bill of Rights under the United States Constitution as well as the English Bill of Rights. I used the European Convention on Human Rights as it is an International Agreement.


  1. Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights


Article 8 provides a right to respect for one’s “private and family life, his home and his correspondence“, subject to certain restrictions that are “in accordance with law” and “necessary in a democratic society”. This article clearly provides a right to be free of unlawful searches, but the Court has given the protection for “private and family life” that this article provides a broad interpretation, taking for instance that prohibition of private consensual homosexual acts violates this article.


  1. Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights
  1.  Article 9 provides a right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. This includes the freedom to change a religion or belief, and to manifest a religion or belief in worship, teaching, practice and observance, subject to certain restrictions that are “in accordance with law” and “necessary in a democratic society”
  2.  Article 10 provides the right to freedom of expression, subject to certain restrictions that are “in accordance with law” and “necessary in a democratic society”. This right includes the freedom to hold opinions, and to receive and impart information and ideas.
  3.  Article 13 provides for the right for an effective remedy before national authorities for violations of rights under the Convention. The inability to obtain a remedy before a national court for an infringement of a Convention right is thus a free-standing and separately actionable infringement of the Convention.

2. Article 13 – effective remedy


(18) Section 1983 of Title 42 of the United States Code

A victim may recover compensatory damages,…


(19) Russian Federation law


The addendum to the article 6 of the Russian Federation law On Weapons, “was approved on July 26, 2001. It states: within the territory of the Russian Federation is prohibited the circulation of weapons and other objects the effects of the operation of which are based on the use of electromagnetic, light, thermal, infra-sonic or ultra-sonic radiations” (30).


(20) International criminal justice standards and Non Lethal Weapons


International criminal justice standards and Non Lethal Weapons NATO policy that express : … “The research and development procurement and employment of Non-Lethal Weapons shall always remain consistent with applicable treaties, conventions and international law, particularly the Law of Armed conflict as well as national law and approved Rules of Engagement.”

International criminal justice standards The following criminal justice standards were adopted under the auspices of the United Nations:

• 1979 Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials, and the • 1990 Basic Principles on the Use of Force. (Page 36)…


(21) UNIDIR has listed non lethal weapons( mind control ) weapons as weapons of mass destruction.


“NON-LETHAL” WEAPONS It is difficult to oppose the development of new means and methods of warfare, which would lead to fewer deaths, injuries, disabilities or deprivation to civilians. However, the term “non-lethal weapons” is applied to a range of old and new weapons the use of which is, purportedly, associated with low lethality. Such weapons can be classified according to how they damage or incapacitate the human body. The following categories of weapon have been cited as having “non-lethal” capabilities: kinetic energy (rubber bullets, sponge bullets, etc.); entangling technologies (nets, sticky foam); chemical weapons; biological weapons; acoustic beams; electric shock technologies; infrasound; and electromagnetic waves of a variety of wavelengths.10


Source: Chinese TI activist Soleil mavis –